Supply chain security incidents dominate the headlines, with a new breach announced every day—whether a software intrusion like SolarWinds or Okta or a supply chain attack like Toyota. More recently, Microsoft announced an intrusion related to a compromised key that granted illicit access to customer data.
With the continued pace of third-party attacks, security teams are left asking: What could possibly happen next?
For many organizations, the answer is: You need to get your third-party risk management (TPRM) house in order by leveraging best practices, guidance, and benchmarks. Often, that guidance comes from common cybersecurity frameworks such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF). Now that the NIST CSF version 2.0 has been finalized, significant changes will impact how you design and implement your TPRM program to address these risks.
In this post, I will examine the most impactful third-party risk management (TPRM) and C-SCRM changes to the NIST CSF, review its Core Functions, and recommend best practices for implementing it as part of your third-party risk management program.
The introduction of the Govern Function illustrates how critical cybersecurity governance is to managing and reducing cybersecurity risk in supply chains. Previous governance content found in the other Functions – Identify, Protect, Detect, Response, and Recover – has been moved into the Govern Function. With the proposed changes, cybersecurity governance includes:
According to NIST, these activities are critical to detecting, responding to, and recovering from cybersecurity-related events and incidents – as well as to overseeing teams who carry out cybersecurity activities for the organization.
As organizations increasingly depend on third parties for essential services and technologies, strong governance becomes critical for managing these risks in a structured and consistent manner. Including the Govern Function in NIST CSF 2.0 supports this need by aligning third-party risk management practices with broader corporate governance frameworks.
A dedicated governance Function will help align and integrate third-party cybersecurity activities and processes across third-party risk management, enterprise risk management, and legal teams. Some aspects to note include:
Enhanced Accountability and Decision-Making:
CSF 2.0's Govern Function highlights the importance of defining clear roles and responsibilities within cybersecurity programs, particularly for managing third-party risks. By establishing accountability, organizations can integrate third-party risk management into the overall governance framework, preventing it from becoming fragmented. It encourages assigning responsibility for vendor risk assessment, contract management, and ongoing compliance monitoring, reducing vulnerabilities. Additionally, the Govern Function promotes formal processes for evaluating third-party risks and making informed decisions about vendor selection and oversight, ensuring these choices align with the organization's risk tolerance and cybersecurity goals.
Policy Development and Compliance:
The Govern Function encourages organizations to create policies covering all aspects of third-party risk management, from vendor selection to continuous monitoring and incident response. These policies ensure that vendors meet security requirements, such as adhering to specific standards, undergoing audits, or implementing security controls. Additionally, the Govern Function addresses compliance with both internal policies and external regulations, helping organizations align third-party risk management with industry standards like HIPAA or FFIEC to ensure compliance and avoid penalties.
Risk Oversight and Continuous Improvement:
NIST CSF 2.0 governance emphasizes the importance of continuous oversight and improvement in third-party risk management. This is also highlighted in the Improvement section of the Identify category. The Govern Function urges organizations to establish processes for regularly reviewing and updating their third-party risk management practices. This allows organizations to adapt strategies as the threat landscape and third-party relationships evolve.
Continuous improvement may include reassessing vendors' security postures, conducting audits, and reviewing third-party incident reports. It also involves updating contracts and service-level agreements (SLAs) to address new cybersecurity risks or regulatory requirements. Embedding these activities into governance ensures continuous monitoring and mitigation of third-party risks.
Consistent with the addition of the Govern Function, CSF 2.0 emphasizes the role of legal and compliance teams. For TPRM, these groups require accurate and timely reporting from suppliers, vendors, and other third-party organizations that may have access to sensitive data, systems, and applications.
The most impactful CSF 2.0 update for TPRM teams is the enhanced guidance on managing supply chain risks. CSF 2.0 includes additional cybersecurity supply chain risk management (C-SCRM) outcomes to help organizations address these distinct risks. According to the CSF, “The primary objective of C-SCRM is to extend appropriate first-party cybersecurity risk management considerations to third parties, supply chains, and products and services an organization acquires, based on supplier criticality and risk assessment.”
The supply chain risk management category has been expanded into the new Govern Function. It includes new provisions incorporating cybersecurity into contracts, contract termination, and continuous evaluation of third-party risks across the organization’s environment.
On Demand Webinar: NIST CSF 2.0: Implications for Your TPRM Program
In this webinar, Dave Shackleford, CEO at Voodoo Security and SANS Senior Instructor, shares his insights on NIST CSF and how the 2.0 framework can help you manage risks from your third-party suppliers.
On-Demand Webinar: NIST CSF 2.0: Implications for TPRM
Join Dave Shackleford, CEO at Voodoo Security and SANS Senior Instructor, as he shares his insights on NIST CSF and how the 2.0 framework can help you manage risks from your third-party suppliers.
The CSF is organized into six Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover. The Core Functions are outcome-oriented and not considered a checklist of actions by NIST. For an illustration of the Core Functions, see the graphic below.
The six Core Functions of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Courtesy: NIST.
A new Function introduced with version 2.0, Govern is foundational and designed to inform how an organization will achieve and prioritize the outcomes of the other five Functions in the context of its broader enterprise risk management strategy. It includes oversight of the cybersecurity strategy, roles, responsibilities, policies, processes, and procedures, and it centralizes cybersecurity supply chain risk management guidance.
The Identify Function is designed to establish an understanding of an organization’s assets (e.g., data, hardware, software, systems, facilities, services, and people) and the related cybersecurity risks.
The Protect Function offers specific guidance to secure assets to reduce the likelihood and impact of adverse cybersecurity events. Included here are topics such as awareness and training, data security, identity management, authentication and access control, platform security (i.e., securing the hardware, software, and services of physical and virtual platforms), and the resilience of technology infrastructure.
The Detect Function is meant to enable the discovery and analysis of anomalies, indicators of compromise, and other potentially adverse cybersecurity events.
The Respond Function includes guidelines for containing the impact of cybersecurity incidents, such as incident management, analysis, mitigation, reporting, and communication.
The Recover Function includes guidelines for restoring normal operations to reduce the impact of cybersecurity incidents.
Nearly every Function includes Categories and Subcategories that directly apply to third-party risk management and cybersecurity supply chain risk management. For example, the Identify Function focuses more on asset and risk identification, including third-party systems and services. Organizations are encouraged to perform due diligence on third parties to identify vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with cybersecurity standards. The Protect and Detect Functions provide guidelines on implementing security controls to mitigate third-party risks, such as monitoring access and ensuring vendor adherence to security policies.
Note: This is a summary table only and is not an exhaustive list of NIST Categories. For a full view of the NIST CSF, download the complete version. Work with your internal audit team and external auditors to determine the right Categories and Subcategories to focus on.
Function, Category & Subcategory | Best Practices |
---|---|
GOVERN (GV): The organization’s cybersecurity risk management strategy, expectations, and policy are established, communicated, and monitored |
|
Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (GV.SC): Cyber supply chain risk management processes are identified, established, managed, monitored, and improved by organizational stakeholders |
|
GV.SC-01: A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders GV.SC-02: Cybersecurity roles and responsibilities for suppliers, customers, and partners are established, communicated, and coordinated internally and externally GV.SC-03: Cybersecurity supply chain risk management is integrated into cybersecurity and enterprise risk management, risk assessment, and improvement processes |
Build a comprehensive third-party risk management (TPRM) or cybersecurity supply chain risk management (C-SCRM) program in line with your broader information security and governance, enterprise risk management and compliance programs.
As part of this process, you should define:
|
GV.SC-04: Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality |
Centralize your third-party inventory in a software solution. Then, quantify inherent risks for all third parties. Criteria used to calculate inherent risk for third-party prioritization should include:
From this inherent risk assessment, your team can automatically tier suppliers; set appropriate levels of further diligence; and determine the scope of ongoing assessments. Rule-based tiering logic should enable vendor categorization using a range of data interaction, financial, regulatory, and reputational considerations. |
GV.SC-05: Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties |
Centralize the distribution, discussion, retention, and review of vendor contracts to automate the contract lifecycle and ensure key clauses are enforced. Key capabilities should include:
With this capability, you can ensure that clear responsibilities and right-to-audit clauses are articulated in the vendor contract, and SLAs tracked and managed accordingly. |
GV.SC-06: Planning and due diligence are performed to reduce risks before entering into formal supplier or other third-party relationships |
Centralize and automate the distribution, comparison and management of requests for proposals (RFPs) and requests for information (RFIs) in a single solution that enables comparison on key attributes. As all service providers are being centralized and reviewed, teams should create comprehensive vendor profiles that contain insight into a vendor’s demographic information, 4th-party technologies, ESG scores, recent business and reputational insights, data breach history, and recent financial performance. This level of due diligence creates greater context for making vendor selection decisions. |
GV.SC-07: The risks posed by a supplier, their products and services, and other third parties are understood, recorded, prioritized, assessed, responded to, and monitored over the course of the relationship |
Look for solutions that feature a large library of pre-built templates for third-party risk assessments. Assessments should be conducted at the time of onboarding, contract renewal, or at any required frequency (e.g., quarterly or annually) depending on material changes. Assessments should be managed centrally and be backed by workflow, task management and automated evidence review capabilities to ensure that your team has visibility into third-party risks throughout the relationship lifecycle. Importantly, a TPRM solution should include built-in remediation recommendations based on risk assessment results to ensure that your third parties address risks in a timely and satisfactory manner and can provide the appropriate evidence to auditors. As part of this process, continuously track and analyze external threats to third parties. Monitor the Internet and dark web for cyber threats and vulnerabilities, as well as public and private sources of reputational, sanctions and financial information. All monitoring data should be correlated with assessment results and centralized in a unified risk register for each vendor, streamlining risk review, reporting, remediation and response initiatives. Be sure to incorporate third-party operational, reputational and financial data to add context to cyber findings and measure the impact of incidents over time. |
GV.SC-08: Relevant suppliers and other third parties are included in incident planning, response, and recovery activities |
As part of your broader incident management strategy ensure that your third-party incident response program enables your team to rapidly identify, respond to, report on, and mitigate the impact of third-party vendor security incidents. Look for managed services where dedicated experts centrally manage your vendors; conduct proactive event risk assessments; score identified risks; correlate risks with continuous cyber monitoring intelligence; and issue remediation guidance. Managed services can greatly reduce the time required to identify vendors impacted by a cybersecurity incident and ensure that remediations are in place. Key capabilities in a third-party incident response service should include:
Also, consider leveraging databases that contain several years of data breach history for thousands of companies around the world – including types and quantities of stolen data; compliance and regulatory issues; and real-time vendor data breach notifications. Armed with these insights, your team can better understand the scope and impact of the incident; what data was involved; whether the third party’s operations were impacted; and when remediations have been completed – all by leveraging experts. |
GV.SC-09: Supply chain security practices are integrated into cybersecurity and enterprise risk management programs, and their performance is monitored throughout the technology product and service life cycle |
Please see GV.SC-01 and GV.SC-02. |
GV.SC-10: Cybersecurity supply chain risk management plans include provisions for activities that occur after the conclusion of a partnership or service agreement |
Building on the best practices recommended for GV.SC-05, automate contract assessments and offboarding procedures to reduce your organization’s risk of post-contract exposure.
|
Align Your TPRM Program with NIST CSF 2.0
Read the Third-Party Compliance Checklist for NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to assess your third-party risk management program against the latest C-SCRM guidelines.
Finalized in February of 2024, version 2.0 can help organizations better incorporate comprehensive TPRM and C-SCRM into their operations, from governance to risk management and cybersecurity. By formalizing governance structures around third-party relationships, ensuring accountability, developing robust policies, and promoting continuous oversight, CSF 2.0 provides a comprehensive framework for addressing the complex risks posed by third parties.
Watch my on-demand webinar with Prevalent to learn more about how NIST CSF 2.0 incorporates TPRM and cybersecurity supply chain risk management controls. I also invite you to download the comprehensive NIST CSF 2.0 checklist developed by Prevalent. It examines the Govern Function and its supply chain risk management controls in detail.
For more on the Prevalent TPRM solution for NIST CSF 2.0, schedule a demonstration with them today.
Leverage these best practices to address NIS2 third-party risk management requirements.
12/03/2024
Ask your vendors and suppliers about their cybersecurity risk management, governance, and incident disclosure processes to...
10/24/2024
Learn how integrating the NIST Privacy Framework with third-party risk management (TPRM) helps organizations enhance data...
09/12/2024