Latest Report: The Gartner® Market Guide for IT Vendor Risk Management Solutions
Third-party risk management (TPRM) policies establish guidelines and practices for how organizations assess, monitor, remediate and report on the risk posed by vendors, suppliers and business partners.
Many organizations overlook the importance of having a clear, standardized, and actionable set of cybersecurity policies and procedures. Third-party risk management policies are even more critical. No matter how good your organization's cybersecurity posture is, poor third-party risk management practices pose an existential threat to your company’s data and supply chain. Many organizations have suffered significant disruptions and even lost vast amounts of customer data from third-party, fourth-party, and even Nth party breaches. It has never been more important to have a clearly defined vendor onboarding process with standardized risk assessment questionnaires and metrics.
Designing a set of third-party risk management policies can seem daunting. You may have to consider hundreds of vendor relationships across dozens of departments including operations, technology, and accounting. Some relationships may already exist, and some may be in the process of onboarding. Ensure that you consult stakeholders across multiple departments throughout the process to make sure that your policies are implementable and applicable to different parts of the organization. Building a clear set of policies can help propel your organization’s third-party risk management practices and ensure that risk is considered throughout the due diligence process and vendor lifecycle.
Before you begin writing your third-party risk management policies, take the time to review your own internal compliance requirements. Here are some requirements to consider when drafting your policies:
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) regulates business’ collection and sale of consumer data to protect California residents’ sensitive personal information and provide consumers with control over how that information is used.
The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (CAIQ) was developed as an industry standard for documenting security controls, and it can be used to aid in security evaluations of IaaS, PaaS, SaaS and other cloud service providers.
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), is a comprehensive framework from the U.S. Department of Defense designed to protect the defense industrial base from increasingly frequent and complex cyberattacks and to ensure that the national defense supply chain is secure and resilient.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Guidelines on Outsourcing Arrangements outlines specific provisions for the European banking sector's governance of outsourcing arrangements and related supervisory processes.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulates financial firms providing services to consumers and maintains the integrity of the financial markets in the United Kingdom. FCA FG 16/5 is designed to help financial firms effectively oversee all aspects of the lifecycle of outsourcing arrangements.
The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) is an interagency body empowered to establish guidelines and uniform principles and standards for the federal examination of financial institutions. The FFIEC IT Exam Handbook is one of a series of booklets on specific topics of interest to field examiners that prescribe uniform principles and standards for financial institutions.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a privacy law that governs the use, movement, and protection of data collected on European Union (EU) citizens. The GDPR covers any organization that collects, stores, processes, or transfers personal data on individuals in Europe, regardless of the organization’s location
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) was established to ensure that sensitive protected health information (PHI) would not be disclosed without the patient’s consent.
The International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) assemble experts to share knowledge and develop international standards to solve global challenges. The ISO 27001, 27002, 27018, 27036-2, and 27701 standards set requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system.
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) critical infrastructure protection (CIP) standard establishes new cybersecurity requirements for electric power and utility companies to ensure, preserve, and prolong the reliability of the bulk electric system (BES).
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a federal agency within the United States Department of Commerce. Several NIST special publications, including NIST 800-53, NIST 800-161, and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) have specific controls that require organizations to establish and implement the processes to identify, assess and manage supply chain risk.
The Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security (SHIELD) Act is a data protection law that applies to organizations that collect personal information from residents of New York State. It is designed to improve cybersecurity protections and data breach notification procedures.
The New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) instituted 23 NY CRR 500 to establish new cybersecurity requirements for financial services companies. The regulation is designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of customer information and related IT systems.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is the group within the Department of the Treasury that charters, regulates, and supervises all national banks and federal savings associations, as well as federal branches and agencies of foreign banks. OCC Bulletins highlight the need for an effective risk management process throughout the lifecycle of third-party relationship.
The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) was developed to enhance cardholder data security and to facilitate the broad adoption of consistent data security measures globally. The standard applies to all entities that store, process or transmit cardholder data.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Assurance Services Executive Committee (ASEC) has developed trust services criteria for organizations to use as a framework for demonstrating the confidentiality, integrity and availability of systems and data. Organizations familiar with System and Organization Control (SOC) 2 audits will recognize that these trust services criteria are used to report on the effectiveness of their internal controls and safeguards over infrastructure, software, people, procedures, and data.
Navigate the TPRM Compliance Landscape
The Third-Party Risk Management Compliance Handbook reveals TPRM requirements in key regulations and industry frameworks, so you can achieve compliance while mitigating vendor risk.
When designing your policies and procedures, make sure to consider broad compliance requirements that may impact business operations. For example, if your company deals with protected health information (PHI), it is important to use your third-party risk management policies to spell out exactly how and when that information is shared with other organizations. Third parties, fourth parties, and Nth parties are required under HIPAA to employ the same safeguards as the primary organization when dealing with protected health information. Failure to comply with these rules can result in large fines to both you and your business associates down the chain.
Many information security requirements place strict limits on the type of data that can be shared with third parties. Make sure to also pay attention to requirements that affect individual business units. For example, GDPR places strict limitations on how the data of European nationals is stored, protected, and transferred. In many cases, only one department, such as marketing, may work with European data. It is critical that you assess the types and quantities of data gathered across the organization to determine compliance needs rather than making assumptions based on your industry.
Your policies should clearly define what information is shared with third parties, when it is shared, and what the protocols are for ensuring the information is protected. In many cases, you may want to require that third-party organizations dealing with sensitive data comply with independent information security requirements such as SOC2 or HIPAA. Failure to do so could result in non-compliance with critical regulatory requirements as well as reputational damage should a third party experience a data breach. Before providing a third party with sensitive information, it is critical to conduct extensive third-party due diligence.
Fortunately, you don’t need to come up with all the controls yourself. When planning out your third-party risk management program you can borrow from widely accepted third-party risk management frameworks such as NIST 800-161 or Shared Assessments TPRM Framework. Using these pre-built frameworks can provide excellent guidance regarding the types of controls that should be included in your third-party risk management policies. Third-party risk can come in a variety of forms. By adhering to a battle-tested framework, you can ensure that your vendor risk management is comprehensive.
In addition, you can utilize other frameworks such as NIST CSF v1.1 and ISO 27036 to help you design your vendor risk assessment questionnaires. Questionnaires are an essential part of the vendor risk management lifecycle and should be mandatory for all new service providers. Third-party risk management policies should clearly stipulate how and when business units are required to administer questionnaires, as well as define acceptable levels of residual risk.
We recommend reviewing Shared Assessments and NIST 800-161 to help plan out what your program needs to look like and the types of controls that are worth including. You can then pick specific controls for your questionnaires from standard information security frameworks. In many cases, we find U.S.-based organizations often rely on NIST, while companies in Europe, Asia, and Africa often choose ISO.
Make sure that your organization is operating from a standard set of documentation when dealing with third-party relationships. Non-disclosure agreements, third-party risk questionnaires, and service level agreements (SLA’s) should be as uniform as possible throughout the procurement lifecycle. Standardization is particularly important when creating your organization's vendor risk assessment questionnaire. Without a standardized vendor evaluation process, you can’t compare different vendors based on the level of risk they pose to your organization.
Third-party risk policies should stipulate that third-party vendors are evaluated based on their level of risk and that high-risk vendors are forced to remediate before becoming part of the supply chain. Vendors should also be continuously monitored for cybersecurity risk, operational risk, and compliance risk throughout the business relationship. Just because an organization was low-risk at the time of onboarding does not mean they will remain so.
Larger businesses with hundreds of third-party contractors are most likely to fall into this category. A fourth party may be subcontracted by a third party. If the subcontracted provider does not adhere to the same information security practices as the primary contractor, then malicious actors may be able to gain access to your organization's data. In many cases, criminal groups may try to penetrate the fourth party and work their way up the system laterally until they find the PII they are looking for.
Contracts between businesses and suppliers must have provisions for fourth parties. If third-party associates are permitted to subcontract, the SLA should require that the fourth party follow the same cybersecurity guidelines as the parent business. If a corporation was unaware that a fourth party was involved and was the source of a data leak, it would be found liable and subject to fines by regulators.
On-Demand Webinar: Avoid These 5 TPRM Mistakes
Third-party risk practitioners from Lowe’s, Pfizer, Cincinnati Insurance and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Kansas City discuss lessons learned when building their third-party risk management programs
Still concerned about being comprehensive enough in your third-party risk management policies? Here are some controls we would recommend to build into your comprehensive vendor risk management policies. For a more comprehensive list, check out our Vendor Risk Management Checklist post.
Vendors required to complete standardized vendor risk assessment questionnaire prior to onboarding
Profiling and tiering to implement a repeatable methodology for assessing vendors
Inherent and residual risk scoring and tracking to clearly identify which vendors present the most impactful risks to the business
Continuous monitoring after onboarding
Vendors are periodically reevaluated to determine if their level of risk has changed
Workflows and ticketing to automate communications
Flexible risk weightings that granularly define the importance of specific risks to the business
Third-party vendors are evaluated for compliance concerns prior to onboarding
Data shared with third parties is carefully documented and retained
Third parties storing your organization’s data are required to remediate non-compliant practices prior to receiving sensitive information
Business monitoring from hundreds of thousands of sources providing intel on business, regulatory, reputational, or legal issues
Optional: Vendors are required to obtain information security certifications prior to onboarding
Vendors are continuously monitored for cybersecurity risk throughout the contract
Cyber monitoring from deep/dark web for real-time risk intelligence insights
Unified risk register that correlates cyber and business risk events with assessment results to validate vendor-reported control data
Transform incoming vendor cyber and business event data into actionable risks, giving you real-time risk visibility
Trigger actions like sending notifications, creating tasks or flags, elevating risk scores, accelerating the risk mitigation process
All contracts with third parties have clear language denoting how data shared with third parties is protected
Vendor agrees to delete all organization data upon contract termination
Vendors contractually obligated to notify the organization of any security breach or suspected data breach
Vendor security policies are thoroughly reviewed and checked against vendor questionnaire answers
Vendor required to provide updates on key personnel, financial, and other areas that could impact supply chain
Each department is required to submit vendor data to a central repository
Vendors deemed to be “high-risk” required to remediate risks to an acceptable level in order to work with the organization
Third-party vendors contractually required to adhere to clear offboarding instructions including the return of equipment, lanyards, badges, and the deletion of any passwords or other sensitive information
Fourth parties and beyond are considered when drafting SLA’s and other key contracts
Implementing an efficient risk control scheme for third-party providers takes time and money. Whether you employ an IT expert or use business services, this is reality. There are several advantages to adopting third-party risk control strategies and procedures, regardless of how daunting it can be.
The Prevalent Third-Party Risk Management Platform unifies vendor management, risk assessment, and threat monitoring to deliver a 360-degree view of risk. The platform makes it easy to onboard vendors; assess them against standardized and custom questionnaires; correlate assessments with external threat data; reveal, prioritize and report on the risk; and facilitate the remediation process.
Regardless of where you are today, Prevalent can help you build a third-party risk management program with unmatched visibility, efficiency, and scale. We’ll work with you to find a mix of managed services, network membership, and/or TPRM platform access that works best for your organization. You’ll gain a fast time to value, be equipped to make intelligence-driven decisions, and measurably reduce vendor-related risk – all with fewer headaches for you and your team. Request a demo now.
If vendor threats and regulations are leaving your team feeling overwhelmed, then consider these benefits of...
Follow these 7 steps for more secure and efficient offboarding when third-party relationships are terminated.
Learn strategies for mitigating risks stemming from cyberattacks against your IT vendors.