Free TPRM tools: Get a free maturity assessment, a free risk report, or business & financial monitoring for 20 vendors!

2021 Third-Party Risk Management Study: What Lurks Beneath the Cyber Risk Surface?

Our annual third-party risk management study shows that most companies are not tracking risks at critical stages of the vendor risk lifecycle. Are you? Download the report and navigate your way to safe waters.
By:
Scott Lang
,
VP, Product Marketing
April 15, 2021
Share:
Blog 2021 tprm study 0421

If your third-party risk management (TPRM) program is focused solely on cybersecurity, then you’re only getting a partial view of risk – what’s commonly visible above the water line. But so much more risk exists below the surface. For example, do you know whether your vendors are meeting SLA requirements? Can you assess the strength of their ethics and anti-bribery and corruption (ABAC) policies? How socially and environmentally conscious are your supplier chain partners?

Prevalent recently surveyed senior decision makers about their organizations’ TPRM focus areas, stakeholders and challenges. Our goal was to understand the current, real-world state of third-party risk management programs. What we found is that many companies struggle to identify the reputation-wrecking business risks that lurk beneath the cybersecurity surface.

In the Prevalent 2021 Third-Party Risk Management Study, we present the full results of the survey and chart strategies for navigating the icy waters of vendor and supplier risk today. This post shares key findings from the study and outlines guidance for expanding your risk visibility throughout the third-party lifecycle.

Key Findings from the 2021 Third-Party Risk Management Study

Results of this year’s study point to four primary observations:

Organizations Are Missing Important Risks – at Their Peril

Two of the biggest events of 2020 – the COVID-19 pandemic and the social and racial justice movements – had little to do with cybersecurity but triggered important third-party risk activities. In fact, 83% of study respondents reported that the pandemic spurred an increased focus on third-party risk at their organizations. However, while the pandemic brought unprecedented challenges for supply chain risk management and vendor performance management, fewer than half of respondents were actively tracking supply chain and performance risks.

At the same time, the ongoing justice movements underscore the importance of working with partners who have sound diversity and ESG policies. Despite this, the study found that few companies actively track third-party risks related to labor standards, the environment and human rights.

Attention Should Be Paid to More Stages in the Third-Party Risk Lifecycle

Every third-party business relationship follows a lifecycle along these lines: pre-contract due diligence, contracting, onboarding, risk assessment, performance management, and offboarding. Interestingly, the number-one challenge cited by study respondents was a lack of pre-contract due diligence. More surprisingly, 59% of companies say they do not actively assess third-party risks during offboarding, which can open the door to data exposures and compliance violations. Need further proof? Just ask Morgan Stanley.

Procurement and Business Teams Are Struggling for a Seat at the TPRM Table

Third-party risk management has long been the domain of IT and security teams. Our study affirms this, with 50% of respondents reporting that IT and security own TPRM in their organizations. And 55% of organizations saw increased ownership by security over the past year. The problem is, only 22% saw an increase in ownership by procurement teams. This trend is concerning, as risks increasingly fall outside of the typical cybersecurity area of responsibility.

Most Organizations Don’t Want to Tackle Third-Party Risk on Their Own

70% of respondents indicated that outsourcing is the preferred method of managing third-party risk. Why? Because a shockingly large number of practitioners (42%) still use spreadsheets as the primary mechanism for vendor risk assessments – and 65% aren’t satisfied with this approach. Respondents also cited the need for a broader range of third-party risk intelligence sources a key to achieving TPRM success.

2021 Third-Party Risk Management Study Infographic

Click the preview to download a PDF of the complete infographic.

Recommendations for Keeping Your Third-Party Risk Management Program Above Water

Here are four (4) recommendations to chart a better course through third-party risks:

#1 – Expand Assessments Beyond Cybersecurity

Vendor risk management isn’t just a security and compliance problem. Many types of risks can impact an organization’s ability to produce, manage, and distribute goods and services. Therefore, security and business teams must work together to expand the scope of vendor risk assessments to include two areas in addition to cybersecurity:

  1. Reputational intelligence on legal actions and sanctions, executive leadership changes, politically exposed persons (PEPs), adverse media, state-owned enterprises, OFAC violations, and other indicators of potential cybersecurity or compliance problems.
  2. Financial information including performance, turnover, profit and loss, shareholder funds, and other indicators.

Look for solutions that normalize monitoring data and correlate it against risk assessment findings to escalate potential risks and identify recommended remediations. Incorporating a broad range of risk intelligence sources will help security and procurement teams make better-informed decisions.

#2 – Bridge the Gap Between Business and IT

Disjointed approaches to assessing third-party risk leave gaps – and gaps introduce risk. You can unify IT security and business teams with a TPRM platform solution that provides a central source for everything from vendor profiles and contracts, to assessment results and compliance reports, to performance metrics and remediation logs. Having a single solution ensures that the entire organization is using the same data to make risk-based decisions.

#3 – Manage Risk at Every Step of the Third-Party Lifecycle

Security, compliance and operational issues can crop up at any time during a vendor or supplier relationship, so it’s important to address risk at each stage of the third-party lifecycle. Be sure to download the full report for guidance on what look for at each step of the vendor risk lifecycle, including:

  1. Sourcing and Selection
  2. Intake and Onboarding
  3. Inherent Risk Scoring
  4. Vendor Risk Assessments
  5. Continuous Risk Monitoring
  6. SLA and Performance Management
  7. Offboarding and Termination

#4 – Outsource the Hard Stuff

The results of this study show that the preferred method of TPRM includes outsourcing on some level. Third-party risk management experts can manage the vendor lifecycle on your behalf – from onboarding vendors and collecting evidence, to reviewing assessments for completeness, identifying risks, and providing remediation guidance. As a result, you can safely navigate dangerous waters by efficiently scaling your TPRM program, reducing vendor risk, and simplifying compliance without burdening your internal staff.

The 2021 Third-Party Risk Management Study

This definitive report from Prevalent is loaded with insightful data, analysis and recommendations from our survey of global risk management practitioners.

Read Now
Blog 2021 tprm study 0421

How Do You Navigate Third-Party Risk?

We found that most companies are missing key risks at more than one stage of the vendor risk lifecycle, leaving their companies exposed to unseen risks. How is your third-party risk management program navigating these challenges compared to the respondents to our survey? Download the full results and review the infographic to benchmark your own TPRM practices.

For more on how Prevalent can help address third-party risk management challenges, request a demo of our platform today.

Tags:
Leadership scott lang
Scott Lang
VP, Product Marketing
Scott Lang has 25 years of experience in security, currently guiding the product marketing strategy for Prevalent’s third-party risk management solutions where he is responsible for product content, launches, messaging and enablement. Prior to joining Prevalent, Scott was senior director of product marketing at privileged access management leader BeyondTrust, and before that director of security solution marketing at Dell, formerly Quest Software. He can be reached on Twitter @scottinohio, LinkedIn and Facebook.
  • Ready to get started?
  • Schedule a personalized solution demonstration to see if Prevalent is a fit for you.
  • Request a Demo